Tuesday, April 24, 2007

tough to take 'em seriously

Isn’t it interesting how quickly a politico can ‘duck-n-cover’, especially in an otherwise very trivial case of haircuts?

So what does a person do with a $400 haircut that can’t be done for $50?  $25?  Or even $9.99?

How can any of these people expect their constituents to take them seriously when their haircuts, THEIR HAIRCUTS!!, cost as much in a year as half the gross earnings of their voter block?  And shame on those voters who don’t ask the most basic of questions of these charlatans, that being:

How can you represent me and my needs in Washington DC

But then, this is cheap compared to the $2K plus Ms.Hillary (or more accurately, her ‘campaign’) shells out to make her ‘camera-ready’.  Is that what the Democrats learned from JFK, that it’s paramount to look good on TV?  Or was it simply that Dick Nixon looked bad, and JFK could do nothing but look better, comparatively speaking?  Honestly, if a politician wants to ask for your vote, and implores you to allow ‘em to represent you, in DC from your district, your state, or in the world from your country, ask them how being so detached from your daily reality of $10 hair care makes them qualified.

It’s time to bring sanity to US politics, starting with something as seemingly trivial as a simple hair cut.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

If HAIR was important, Mel Kiper Jr. would be President for Life!